Views For A Change
Jim Harrington
answers:
The most successful succession planning I have seen is
when a powerful General develops a plan to overthrow the
current President of a country. I hope that this is not
the type of succession planning that you are interested
in at Nestle.
Organizations that are truly
interested in effective succession planning start with
career planning at all levels of the organization. This
allows for a continuous flow of talented people that can
be considered for each promotion. At the executive level
there should always be a minimum of three people being
groomed to compete for each assignment.
Career planning and succession
planning go together like bread and butter with career
planning being the bread and succession planning the
butter. The combination is great; however, eating bread
alone is pretty dry and eating butter alone will make you
sick.
You want me to provide you with a step-by-step plan for
succession planning and AQP wants me to do this in 800
words or less. That represents a real challenge so I must
keep my answer to your question at a very high
level.
Step 1
Develop a career planning procedure that will be applied
to each employee. Each career plan should be updated at
least once a year. The employee should be the one who
defines the assignment that he or she would like to
retire from. The manager works with the employee as a
mentor explaining what skills, education and work
commitment are required to be competitive for the
specific desired assignment. The manager provides the
realism test that keeps everyone from saying that they
want to be president of the organization. The manager
then works with the employee to help define what the next
two or three moves would be in order to prepare the
employee to be competitive for his or her ultimate
assignment. Together the manager and employee will also
define what outside activities (school, professional
association, leadership position, teaching, etc.) the
employee needs to undertake during the coming year to
prepare for his or her long-term objectives or to be more
competitive for the next step in the career
plan.
Step 2
A set of career tracks should be defined that leads the
employee through the organizational structure.
Step 3
Position descriptions should be prepared that define each
job, the prerequisites and the desired talents and
background related to each assignment on the career track
(ladder).
Step 4
All managers should be trained on how to do career
counseling and how to use the career tracks and the
position descriptions.
Step 5
Once a year the career plan is prepared or updated,
making appropriate changes. If the manager feels the
employee is doing the present job at a high performance
level and has developed the skills necessary to perform
the activities in the next logical step in the
individual’s career track, the manager should
inform the employee that he or she will be recommended
for movement to the next step in the career track should
an opening occur. This information should also be
inputted into a database that is used to define which
employees are considered for assignments when an opening
occurs. It is important that the manager explain to the
employee that because he or she is recommended for a job
does not mean that the employee will be the best
candidate for that job. In most cases there will be 3 or
4 qualified candidates for each job and the best
qualified will get it. All that being recommended does is
guarantee that the employee will be considered and if he
or she is not selected he or she will be informed as to
why another candidate was selected and what he or she
should do to make himself or herself more
competitive.
Step 6
A succession planning policy should be prepared. The
policy defines which assignments must have potential
successors identified for. It will also define the fast
track approach to develop candidates when insufficient
candidates are identified by the career planning
process.
For the executive team you should set some specific
requirements.
For example:
1. All of the direct reports to the plant manager should
be professional managers not technologists.
2. All of the direct reports should have career
objectives of being the plant manager.
3. The direct reports should all be rotated every two to
three years to provide them with the required experience
and knowledge about the total organization.
4. No one should be considered for the plant
manager’s assignment unless they have managed at
least three of the functions that report to the plant
manager.
Note that you need succession planning
for both management and technical positions. This means
you need to establish a dual ladder that allows for
growth in technical skills as well as managerial skills.
The worst mistake an organization can make is to select
managers primarily based upon their technical skills. I
like to have all people that have held or are holding
managerial assignments to have two ratings, a technical
rating and a managerial level rating.
John Runyan
Responds
|