Articles
Creating A Workplace Community
Finding Your Way Through Performance
Measurement
A Quality Vacation On The Jersey
Shore
The Honda Dirtbusters Cleaned Up In
Nashville
Consolidation Processes Save Time, Money And Win
Awards
Columns
As Goes The Follower, So Goes The
Leader
by Peter Block
Off -Target Marketing - Can We
Talk
by Bill Brewer
Features
Brief Cases
Business News
Briefs
Views for a Change
Pageturners
Book Review
|
|
Views For A Change
H. James Harrington Responds:
I agree that our primary and secondary
education systems are in big trouble. That is not just an
opinion, it has been proven in study after study.
A recent international study revealed that of all the
students in countries surveyed, U.S. high school
graduates scored the poorest in math and science. In
other studies of students ages eight and 12 it was
concluded that out of 16 developed countries analyzed the
United States ranked fourteenth in knowledge and
application of learning. Meanwhile, the San Francisco
school board ponders the very important issue of the
correct ratio of minority authors in school libraries
instead of addressing why many students are incapable of
reading any of the books.
The United States spends more money and gets less results
from its education system than any other developed
country. The United States spends 6.8 percent of its GNP
on education, compared with Japan’s 6.5 percent and
Germany’s 4.7 percent. Only 7 percent of our
17-year olds are prepared for college level science
courses. The real problem rests in defining the role that
the school system should play. Is the faculty there to be
children sitters or teachers? Entertainers or educators?
It would seem that we could make major progress by
benchmarking almost any other country in the world.
However, I do not believe that it is the education system
that is the biggest problem. The problem is not the size
of our classes or the number of computers that are
available per student. Of course they help when you
consider the disadvantages you place our teachers under.
The real problem is the input materials (students) that
are provided to the system. The education system is
designed to handle the inputs it receives. The education
system that receives hard-working, disciplined,
respectful, eager students will function extremely well
even with bad equipment and large student to teacher
ratios.
I was absolutely appalled to see on the United Airlines
ABC News on April 30, 1998 that a school in New York was
teaching morality to their students because the parents
do not have the time to do it. You may question, was this
the right thing to do? Well, the results have been very
positive. The number of students expelled from school in
one year’s period dropped from 125 to two. Sure,
morality is more important than reading and writing, but
is it the school’s or the parents’
responsibility? I believe that the education
system’s first responsibility is the three
R’s and the parents’ responsibility is to
prepare their children to be hard-working, disciplined,
respectful, eager students. Without correcting the
deficiencies in the input to a system, you cannot expect
that system to produce excellent results.
We all know that there are some excellent outputs from
today’s education system. Ask yourself why most of
the valedictorians come from first generation American
families. Do not misunderstand me, the highest percentage
of our children are really good kids that want to learn
but they are faced with major distractions:
1. A small percentage of the students,
that do not care about learning, distract the other
students and set the culture for the whole class. This
small percentage of students also receive the majority of
the teacher’s time. Remember the adage, “One
bad apple spoils the barrel.”
2. Parents are too busy to take an
active role in their child’s education. They are
more interested in the TV or the basketball game. Parents
are like top management, what they are interested in,
gets done.
The median number of hours adults spend at work per week
has increased over the last 20 years.
1975 40.0 hrs/week
1997 49.5 hrs/week
This represents a decrease of 23.7 percent of available
time parents have to spend with their children. In
addition, 70 percent of executives, business owners,
managers, and salespeople work in excess of 55 hours per
week. Where has all that time gone that computers were
suppose to have saved us?
3. There are many activities competing
for their time, most of which are more fun than studying.
The basic attitude that prevails today is, “Enjoy
life while you are young.” “Work” is
the worst of all 4-letter words.
Ask yourself how many board of education meetings you
have missed in the last year. You may reply that you do
not have any children in school but that does not relieve
you of your obligation to help ensure the excellence of
our education system. If American adults truly cared
about the educational system there would be standing room
only at all board of education meetings.
I believe that a Malcolm Baldrige type award and
benchmarking will provide minimum overall improvement in
our education system. A more effective approach to
improving the output of our education system is to
improve the input to the system. The best way to do this
is by:
PARENTS SPENDING HALF THE MONEY
AND TWICE THE TIME ON THEIR CHILDREN.
Maybe what we need is a Malcolm
Baldrige type award for families, along with a tax break
for any family that gets more than 500 points.
John Runyan
Responds
|