25 Years Later, Exxon Valdez Spill's Lessons Resurface

USA TODAY

March 26, 2014

Twenty-five years ago this week, the tanker Exxon Valdez struck Bligh Reef in Alaska, causing what was then the largest oil spill in U.S. history. That tragedy is refocusing questions about the risks of the oil business as a large spill this weekend fouls Galveston Bay and new efforts aim to drill far offshore in the Arctic.

The Exxon Valdez spewed about 11 million gallons of oil—roughly what 17 Olympic-size swimming pools could hold—into the pristine Prince William Sound. The oil spread to 1,300 miles of shoreline, killing hundreds of thousands of fish, birds and other wildlife.

"What I remember most is weeks going by without any real response on the water," recalls Marilyn Heiman, then working for the Alaska legislature. "What little (cleanup) equipment they did have was obsolete and covered in snow." Thousands of fishing and tourism jobs were lost.

"Our wild fishing way of life collapsed overnight. Herring and wild salmon runs disappeared and have never fully recovered," Dune Lankard, a native Eyak Athabaskan fisherman said last week.

The damage isn't completely gone. "You can still see the oil if you dig just below the surface in some areas," says Heiman, who now directs the Pew Charitable Trust's U.S. Arctic program.

Heiman says the oil spill killed an estimated 250,000 seabirds, 2,800 sea otters, 300 harbor seals, 250 bald eagles, at least a dozen killer whales and billions of salmon and herring eggs.

"It was, without a doubt, a disaster," says Charles Ebinger, director of the Energy Security Initiative at the Brookings Institution, a Washington-based research group. He recalls the sight of birds unable to fly, because they were covered in oil, and the challenge of cleaning up a spill in a remote, cold part of the world.

"It is remarkable ... the cleanup was relatively successful," Ebinger says, adding most wildlife have also recovered.

The March 24, 1989, spill, however, has had a lasting impact. It prompted Congress to pass a 1990 law to improve the nation's ability to prevent and respond to oil spills, including a requirement that tankers have double hulls.

Still, other accidents have happened. Nearly four years ago, on April 20, 2010, the BP-operated Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico, killing 11 workers and triggering the largest oil spill in U.S. history.

On Saturday near Texas City, a barge collided with a ship in the busy Houston Ship Channel and one of its tanks ruptured, spilling what Coast Guard officials say is up to 168,000 gallons of oil into Galveston Bay.

As the Exxon Valdez spill marks its 25th anniversary, oil companies are looking to develop offshore oil and gas in the Arctic. This push began several years ago when global oil prices soared and the U.S. Geological Survey reported that the Arctic held 13% of the world's undiscovered oil resources and 30% of natural gas ones, most of them offshore.

Global warming has added to this impetus by causing the loss of more summer sea ice, making the waterways more accessible. "It is creating the prospect of new maritime routes that would shorten transportation time," to Europe and Asia, says Ebinger, co-author of a Brookings study, "Offshore Oil and Gas Governance in the Arctic," out Monday.

"There is an increased push to drill offshore into ever deeper and riskier frontier waters of the Arctic," Heiman says. "Those waters are ice-covered for eight to nine months of the year and in almost complete darkness for nearly three of those months. Even during the summer, when the ice pack has mostly receded, the Arctic experiences high seas, wind, freezing temperatures, dense fog, and floating ice hazards."

Even more challenging is the lack of major highways, airports, and ports, Heiman says, adding cleanup technology has not improved much in the last 25 years.

U.S. companies, notably Shell in 2012, have encountered technical setbacks in their forays into offshore drilling in the Arctic, but that's not stopping other countries from moving forward.

"The Russians are proceeding apace," Ebinger says. "They see the Arctic as critical in their future oil and gas development." He and Heiman say the U.S. government needs to do more to address the challenges posed by the Arctic's development.

Copyright © LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.  
Terms and Conditions    Privacy Policy

Quality News Today is an ASQ member benefit offering quality related news
from around the world every business day.

ASQ is a global community of people passionate about quality, who use the tools, their ideas and expertise to make our world work better. ASQ: The Global Voice of Quality.