Salary Survey 2013: Read Their Minds

Abstract:The 2013 QP salary survey revealed a slight improvement in 2013 in average salaries of quality professionals in the United States and Canada. New to this version of the annual survey was a set of questions asking hiring managers to describe what they look for in new hires. The methodology used for ranking the relevant factors is explained. The article also explains the methodology behind interpreting the large amounts of data from all sections of the survey. Sections focusing on the following factors present and analyze the survey results: 1) the methodology behind interpreting the large amounts of data; 2) salary by job title; 3) an analysis of regional variations, looking at salary by United States regions and Canadian provinces; 4) salary by number of years in the quality field; 5) salary by ASQ and Exemplar Global certification; and 6) salary by Six Sigma training. The correlation of quality professional salaries with various factors not covered in the print issue is shown in nineteen …

Access this article
Other ways to access this article
Please register to access this article

Social Bookmarking

Digg, delicious, NewsVine, Furl, Google, StumbleUpon, BlogMarks, Facebook

Good list of parameters
--Nagaraj, 07-27-2014

By not including degrees, credentials, etc., you missed an important part of this profession. There has been a shift in the profession whereby hiring managers are now REQUIRING applicants to have an RN in addition to other credentials. This is regardless of those professionals who have had many, many years of experience in quality and are credentialed in quality. They cannot get past HR with their resume. This survey did a disservice to them.
--Barbara Palermo, 12-20-2013

Featured advertisers