Seen & Heard
Explaining early exits
Here is another viewpoint to the Career Corner column, "Who’s Responsible?" (February 2013, pp. 54-55): I’ve seen early career professionals come and go within three to five years. One reason I see is the training and job development is not accelerated enough for them. Experience comes after training and job development—not advancement the next day.
The early career professionals are used to frequent changes in their lifestyles. A case in point is how often they abandon last year’s iPods for this year’s model. They want "instant pudding" solutions. When it doesn’t happen, they move on.
Another reason I see is that it takes three to five years for companies to realize the money they’ve invested in hiring isn’t paying off. Because of the lack of experience, the early career professionals find they are unable to maintain their standing in their position, so they move on to another job and start the cycle all over again.
The days of longevity in a job are long gone—along with experience and, in many cases, company loyalty. These are two commodities that successful companies require.
Huntingdon Valley, PA
Time for a new outlook
I have a few comments about Figure 4 (p. 42) in the article, "In the Crosshairs" (January 2013, pp. 38-44), although you may be fully aware of what I’ll write. Setting aside the cycle time data of -105, which I don’t understand, I’ve used the other information to make some calculations. My experience indicates that the lognormal distribution describes many time events. Thus, using the mean of 41.44 and the standard deviation of 65.84, I calculate the median to be 22.07, which compares well with the median of 21.0 shown. The mode calculates to be ∼6. The expected range of the data to be ∼0.5 to ∼1,350. The max listed is 1,274.
Author’s response: Thank you for your thoughtful question and insightful alternative to time-based characterization.
As far as the negative time value as the minimum value of -105 in Figure 4, in my experience, I have found negative time to be a common artifact in this analysis despite no presence of such negative time in the data set.
I really appreciated your suggestion of using a lognormal distribution as a more effective method of characterization. I had not previously explored this, and this is now part of my toolbox because it resolves many limitations around time-based characterization.
QP’s Most Popular
- Beyond the Basics: Seven new tools to add to your quality toolbox.
- Outputs and Outcomes: Defining, distinguishing and differentiating project deliverables.
- Learning to Fish: Use a modified fishbone diagram to develop your career.
- Facing Tight Times: Results from the 2012 Salary Survey and how to take control of your career.
- Email Matters: How to better manage your unwieldy inbox.
Food safety culture
Hear Syed Wasi Asghar Zaidi, author of "The Right Ingredients" (pp. 18-23), discuss the importance of having the right quality mindset when building a food safety management system in this month’s author audio.
See a cross-functional flowchart, known as a swim lane diagram, that helped the author of this month's One Good Idea column, "Form by Design," (p. 64) create a robust, yet streamlined and easy-to-use, corrective action and preventive action form.
Quick Poll Results
Each month at www.qualityprogress.com, visitors can take an informal survey. Here are the numbers from a last month’s Quick Poll:
"What is the right way to ensure a lean Six Sigma project stays on track?"
- Regular check-in meetings. 39.7%
- A Champion. 27.9%
- A project manager. 16.1%
- Unified training. 16.1%
Visit www.qualityprogress.com for the latest question:
"What is the best way organizations can improve food quality and safety?"
- Adhere to the Food Safety Modernization Act.
- Adopt a quality mindset.
- Apply more science and risk-mitigation practices.
- Incorporate the ISO 22000
Quality News Today
Battle Over Blame in
Horse Meat Scandal
High-stakes lawsuits, overlapping investigations and a bitter battle over blame are spreading across Europe in the wake of a scandal that has rocked the meat industry.
Chevron Faces $1 Million in Penalties
for Refinery Fire
The California Division of Occupational Safety and Health proposed penalties on Chevron totaling nearly $1 million for alleged safety standard violations related to the Aug. 6 fire at the company's Richmond, CA, refinery.
Want the latest quality-related news and analysis?
The QNT Weekly e-newsletter delivers it every Friday.