Apples to Oranges?

Abstract:In the 2000s, an international initiative to harmonize various national food safety standards led to the publication of ISO 22000:2005, "Food safety management systems—Requirements for any organization in the food chain." The scope of ISO 22000 is deliberately limited to food safety. This sets it apart from ISO 9001, which covers quality management system requirements. As a result of this approach, ISO 22000 was developed to be compatible with ISO 9001. The standard writers never intended for ISO 22000 to replace ISO 9001. Thus, if a food organization wants to develop a management system that covers both food safety and quality, the organization should develop a management system that integrates both standards. One major difference between the two standards is that ISO 22000 is a risk mitigation standard. It uses a hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) as its risk management approach, and as a preventive approach to food safety, Thus, ISO 22000 does not have a specific …

Access this article
Other ways to access this article
Please register to access this article

Social Bookmarking

Digg, delicious, NewsVine, Furl, Google, StumbleUpon, BlogMarks, Facebook

I'm in agreement. When dealing with food safety, the ISO9001 behaves like an OPRP where achievement of the quality parameters including customer (consumer) requirements are achieved.
ISO9001 sets the bar slightly higher and honest implementation would lead to achieving 22000. But this is not always the case as 9000 tends to keep the bar above reach while 22000 sets the barrier behind.

From the Quality perspective, 22000 defines the minimum quality requirement for food- safety. these are non-negotiable customer requirement and inherent characteristics of the product (food)

--Patrick Gikunju, 04-14-2014

--Mohammad Mamdouh, 03-14-2013

Featured advertisers