TQM vs. BPR

Article

Fazel, Farzaneh   (2003, ASQ)   Illinois State University, Normal, IL

Quality Progress    Vol. 36    No. 10
QICID: 19226    October 2003    pp. 59-62
List $10.00
Member $5.00

This article is available for FREE to ASQ members with the appropriate membership type and/or magazine subscriptions. If you are signed-in you should be able to download articles you are entitled to receive. If you have questions about your membership please contact Customer Care at 800-248-1946 or help@asq.org

 

Article Abstract

[This abstract is based on the author's abstract.]

Although the actual terms total quality management and business process reengineering aren't heard much anymore, many organizations still use these programs to make changes. Both embrace the same ideas and goals for organizational improvements and both encourage employee empowerment, teamwork, quality, change and focus on the customer. The main difference is in the means each program uses to achieve improvements. TQM aims at long-term continuous improvements in customer satisfaction and real costs, while BPR offers rapid and radical redesign of strategic processes to optimize the workflow and productivity. Instead of simply choosing one or the other of these approaches, quality advocates now suggest that the short-term changes achieved through BPR should be followed by TQM's long-term continuous improvements.

Keywords

Business process reengineering (BPR),Change,Continuous improvement (CI),Total Quality Management (TQM),Improvement,Quality tools,Teamwork,Customer focus


Browse QIC Articles Chronologically:     Previous Article     Next Article

New Search

Featured advertisers





ASQ is a global community of people passionate about quality, who use the tools, their ideas and expertise to make our world work better. ASQ: The Global Voice of Quality.