The Effect of Ignoring Small Measurement Errors in Precision Instrument Calibration

Article

Carroll, Raymond J.; Spiegelman, Clifford H.   (1986, ASQC)   University of North Carolina; National Bureau of Standards

Journal of Quality Technology    Vol. 18    No. 3
QICID: 5550    July 1986    pp. 170-173
List $10.00
Member $5.00

FOR A LIMITED TIME, ACCESS TO THIS CONTENT IS FREE!
You will need to be signed in.
New to ASQ? Register here.

Article Abstract

This paper discusses the effect of measurement errors in both variables when using the simple linear regression model. It is often stated that if the measurement error in x is small, then we can ignore this error and fit the model to data using ordinary least squares. There is some ambiguity in the statistical literature concerning the exact meaning of a small error. For example, Draper and Smith (1981) state that if the measurement error variance in x is small relative to the variability of the true x's, then "errors in the x's can be effectively ignored." See Montgomery and Peck (1983) for a similar statement. Scheffe (1973) and Mandel (1984) argue for a second criterion, which may be informally summarized that the error in x should be small relative to (the standard deviation of the observed Y about the line)/(slope of the line). We argue that for calibration experiments, both criteria are useful and important; the former for estimation of x given Y, and the latter for the lengths of confidence intervals for x given Y.

Keywords

Statistics,Calibration,Inverse regression,Least squares,Linear regression,Measurement error


Browse QIC Articles Chronologically:     Previous Article     Next Article

New Search

Featured advertisers





ASQ is a global community of people passionate about quality, who use the tools, their ideas and expertise to make our world work better. ASQ: The Global Voice of Quality.