As Easy as 1, 3, 9?

Article

Zwillinger, Dan   ()  

Six Sigma Forum Magazine    Vol. 12    No. 4
QICID: 36181    August 2013    pp. 23-26

FOR A LIMITED TIME, ACCESS TO THIS CONTENT IS FREE!
You will need to be signed in.
New to ASQ? Register here.

The copyright of this article is not held by ASQ. Please ask the Knowledge Center for contact information for the copyright holder.

Article Abstract

Weighted matrices appear in many contexts in Six Sigma. They appear, for example, when computing risk priority numbers (RPN) in a failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). In this case, the RPNs are the products of three individual values. In other contexts, the important results are the products of two values. The values being multiplied are often integers from some range, perhaps one to 10. When working with weighted matrices, the analysis is often simplified by using a scaled set of values; instead of using one to 10, you may use only the values low, medium and high—perhaps represented numerically by one, three and nine. It is natural to wonder if one, three and nine are the best integer values for low, medium and high. Issues can arise when using scalings. A metric is defined that minimizes those issues, and enumeration is used to determine the best scalings: those that minimize this metric. In fact, a one-three-nine scaling is optimal. In addition, there’s a statistical technique that easily allows a way to determine whether the optimal one-three-nine scaling has been used correctly.

Keywords

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA); Risk priority numbers (RPN); Six Sigma; Matrices; Matrix scores; Optimal scaling;


Browse QIC Articles Chronologically:     Previous Article     Next Article

New Search

Featured advertisers





ASQ is a global community of people passionate about quality, who use the tools, their ideas and expertise to make our world work better. ASQ: The Global Voice of Quality.