What Benchmarking Books Don't Tell You

Article

Lincoln, Sarah; Price, Art   (1996, Nancy Miller, AT&T (fax 908/582-3146; phone 908/582-6880))   AT&T Global Business Communications Systems, Denver, CO

Quality Progress    Vol. 29    No. 3
QICID: 13062    March 1996    pp. 33-36

FOR A LIMITED TIME, ACCESS TO THIS CONTENT IS FREE!
You will need to be signed in.
New to ASQ? Register here.

The copyright of this article is not held by ASQ. Please ask the Knowledge Center for contact information for the copyright holder.

Article Abstract

Benchmarking teams should consider the following tips. First, decrease the usual nine to 12 months required for a benchmarking study by: having team members contribute at least 20% of their time; using expert consultants for parts of the study; and collecting comparison data about their own company before benchmarking others. Second, select a scope that is feasible. The broad-and-shallow technique examines the most visible elements of many processes or functions, while a narrow-and-deep methodology looks in detail at only a few elements of a process or function. Third, critical success factors (CSFs) must drive decisions about scope, key measures, questions, analyses, recommendations, and which companies to benchmark. Fourth, the team must be aware that there might be no precise fit of a best-in-class benchmarking partner. The best partners are those that meet fundamental attribute criteria and that are the best performers according to the CSF measures. Fifth, the benchmarking team and all the organization's stakeholders need change management skills for implementation of the team's recommendations.

Keywords

Benchmarking,Measurement and control,Process analysis,Teams


Browse QIC Articles Chronologically:     Previous Article     Next Article

New Search

Featured advertisers





ASQ is a global community of people passionate about quality, who use the tools, their ideas and expertise to make our world work better. ASQ: The Global Voice of Quality.