Download the Article (PDF, 66 KB)
Due to the large amount of books written about Six Sigma, I divided my recommendations into four categories:
After offering a few suggestions in each category, I will then discuss a fifth category: books I wish existed because they would fill the gaps in the Six Sigma literature.
What Is Six Sigma, and Why Should My Organization Do It?
I recommend these two books:
How To Manage Six Sigma
I recommend these two books:
Books on the DMAIC Cycle
I recommend these three books:
Design for Six Sigma
One book comes clearly to mind in this category: Design for
Six Sigma in Technology and Product Development, C.M. Creveling,
J.L. Slutsky and Dave Antis Jr., Prentice Hall, 2002. This book
does an excellent job of not confusing DFSS with some particular variant
of design of experiments. Instead, the authors spend the majority of their
time discussing the nonstatistical issues related to DFSS.
Books I Wish Existed
Practitioners and educators would both benefit from a collection of detailed
case studies. The number of successful Black Belt projects using some
variant of the DMAIC cycle is large, and we still don’t have detailed
documentation of enough projects. More project results need to be published
so a broader group of people can meaningfully comment on the methodology,
aid in a discussion of how to improve the Six Sigma process and toolkit,
and permit effective teaching of the concepts of Six Sigma in a sophisticated
way.
I find the material available to the public involves an unfortunate lockstep
adherence to the MAIC cycle, instead of the DMAIC cycle. Other methods
do exist. For example, I recommend reading about the thought mapping methods
discussed in “The Thought Map” by Cheryl Hild, Doug Sanders
and Bill Ross (Quality Engineering, 2000, pp. 21-27).
Among the unfortunate aspects of the current DMAIC cycle, however, is the typical banishment of the methods of process study tied to the statistical control chart used in the control step. The Six Sigma community would benefit from a rich and full public discussion of how to improve the Six Sigma process and toolbox.
It would also be nice to have more discussion of how Six Sigma fits into the general history of the evolution of improvement methods. Harry and Schroeder offer some insights, but the full story has yet to be told. (Editor’s note: The August 2003 issue of SSFM has an article on this subject. See “The Evolution of Six Sigma” by Jim Foloran, p. 38.)
Six Sigma Bestsellers*
Matt Barney and Tom McCarty, Prentice Hall, 2002.
*Compiled using data from Amazon.com, ASQ Quality Press and BN.com.