ASQ - Electronics and Communications Division

System Reliability Models with Stress Covariates for Changing Load Profiles

Abstract: 2010 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must first be obtained from the IEEE.

This paper presents various models to estimate reliability for a future profile with increased stress using the current observations to develop a model for future reliability. For the foreseeable future the equipment itself will not change, and thus the increase of the load or stress, that the system is exposed to, may decrease reliability and increase maintenance. The model is required to determine the impact of these future profiles. This paper is motivated by an actual application modeling the current and anticipated future reliability of naval aircraft launch and recovery equipment (ALRE). The cyclesto- failure data (CTF) was generated by simulation and serves as the basis in explaining four methods that will be evaluated during 2011-2012. System reliability models are presented and demonstrated to anticipate system reliability and availability for changing and increasing applied loading distributions. These models are intended for systems whose components are exposed to predictable and quantifiable, but changing loading patterns. In the intended application, the models will be used to estimate the future reliability of naval aircraft catapult and arresting gear when subjected to different air wing compositions. Each air wing usage profile is potentially different, forming a distribution of usage stresses, and this distribution is shifting with time, as aircraft weight and missions change. The current ALRE systems will continue to be used for the foreseeable future and the model is required to predict future performance and to identify the most unreliable components or problems within the existing design. Weibull distribution models are used in the typical fashion to model component failure times, but the initial Weibull distribution parameters are mathematical functions of the current, known applied stress distributions. These component models are then used within a discrete event simulation model to predict system reliability and availability. After this initial evaluation, models and software normally applied for accelerated life testing applications are used to develop models which have Weibull distribution parameters that are both mathematical functions with usage stress covariates and also mathematical functions of the distribution or variations in the changing applied loading conditions. Four specific modeling approaches are presented, and compared and contrasted based on data requirements, practicality and other criteria. The four modeling approaches involved models and data analysis at the component-level based on (i) linear stress adjusted usage measures in place of time, (ii) nonlinear stress adjusted usage measures in place of time, (iii) Weibull shape parameters modeled using a general log-linear model based on the mean and standard deviation of critical stress measures in a changing environment, and (iv) Weibull shape parameters modeled using a general log-linear model based on the distributional form of critical stress measures in a changing environment. The component models are then assembled into a system model. This methodology is demonstrated and compared on an example system using simulated data. The models collectively provide a practical methodology to use existing failure and usage stress data to predict future reliability based on a changing and increasing loading pattern.

Keywords: RAMS 2011 Proceedings - System Reliability - Strength-Load - Weibull - Accelerated Life Testing

Already a member? Access this Content

You will need Adobe Reader to view this PDF document.
Download the free Reader from Adobe

  • Print this page
  • Save this page

Average Rating


Out of 0 Ratings
Rate this item

View comments
Add comments
Comments FAQ

ASQ News