Achieving Reliability Goals for an EFV LRU through Laboratory Testing

Abstract: © 2011 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must first be obtained from the IEEE.

Aggressive field and laboratory testing of the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicles (EFV) Hull Electronics Unit (HEU) resulted in a highly reliable product, and provides a qualitative comparison of different test technologies and philosophies. Test methods include qualification, reliability growth testing (RGT), statistical reliability testing (SRT), and hybrid SRT/RGT. Test technologies include traditional single-exciter single-axis (SESA) electrodynamic (ED) shakers, multi-exciter multi-axis (MEMA) ED shakers, and pneumatic repetitive shock (RS).

Qualitative comparison of the different test methods show that qualification, RGT, and SRT with random vibration are all highly useful methods in determining design ruggedness. The applicability of either method is determined by the individual cost-schedule-quality needs of a program. Of the test technologies used, MEMA shaker technology produces greatest ability to apply test results to reliability information.

Keywords: RAMS 2011 Proceedings - Accelerated Life Testing - Product Reliability

Already a member? Access this Content

You will need Adobe Reader to view this PDF document.
Download the free Reader from Adobe

  • Print this page
  • Save this page

Average Rating

Rating

Out of 0 Ratings
Rate this item

View comments
Add comments
Comments FAQ

ASQ News

Watch ASQ Weekly for updates!!     

 

 

RAMS 2015